It is reasonably obvious that the woman mentioned in this quote and her family were "baptized", or immersed into water, seeing that they were gathered by the side of a river.
This is yet another example further establishing that water baptisms administered AFTER Jesus had ascended were only allowed AFTER the candidate had accomplished the "baptism" into Jesus Christ as demanded in Galatians 3:27, "For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ."
In this example the woman, "whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul." had already accepted the sacrifice of Christ BEFORE she and her family were immersed in water.
I was raised to believe that Christians are to be "baptized" in water after having accepted Christ and His sacrifice as the remitter of all sins, or as commonly said, after having been saved by grace.
That doctrine provides that water "baptism" authorizes Church membership and identifies the newly "baptized" believer as a follower of Christ. There are those who even contend that if one is not "baptized" in water, that one cannot receive the Holy Ghost.
We know that part to be wrong since Cornelius and his family received the Holy Ghost BEFORE they were immersed in water. Acts chapter 10.
I have, in my very intense study of the New Testament, never been able to find sufficient scriptural evidence to affirm the above assumption. If any one of you can help me with establishing this doctrine, please do so. Give me the references that establish that premise.
Today's example of the term "baptized" clearly indicates that the medium into which the woman and her family were immersed, was water.~
No comments:
Post a Comment