This lesson is a furtherance of yesterday's and deals again with "tongues" and "prophesy".
Yesterday I posted the definition of "tongues" as it is related in Strong's Bible Dictionary. That same dictionary defines "prophesy" as: "to prophesy, to be a prophet, speak forth by divine inspirations, to predict, to prophesy, with the idea of foretelling future events pertaining esp. to the kingdom of God, to utter forth, declare, a thing which can only be known by divine revelation, to break forth under sudden impulse in lofty discourse or praise of the divine counsels, under like prompting, to teach, refute, reprove, admonish, comfort others, to act as a prophet, discharge the prophetic office."
Yesterday I posted the definition of "tongues" as it is related in Strong's Bible Dictionary. That same dictionary defines "prophesy" as: "to prophesy, to be a prophet, speak forth by divine inspirations, to predict, to prophesy, with the idea of foretelling future events pertaining esp. to the kingdom of God, to utter forth, declare, a thing which can only be known by divine revelation, to break forth under sudden impulse in lofty discourse or praise of the divine counsels, under like prompting, to teach, refute, reprove, admonish, comfort others, to act as a prophet, discharge the prophetic office."
The correct definition of the term, as it is applied in this text is "to teach, refute, reprove, admonish, or comfort others.
Paul, in this lesson, is praising the virtues of one who chooses to prophesy over one who might want to speak in an "unknown tongue" simply because he/she has that ability. He again clearly states that speaking in tongues serves no spiritual purpose whatsoever, and is simply a waste of time unless the speaker (teacher) does not speak the language of the congregation, in which case the speaker is to provide an interpreter so that the congregation is able to understand what the speaker is saying.
Paul, in this lesson, is praising the virtues of one who chooses to prophesy over one who might want to speak in an "unknown tongue" simply because he/she has that ability. He again clearly states that speaking in tongues serves no spiritual purpose whatsoever, and is simply a waste of time unless the speaker (teacher) does not speak the language of the congregation, in which case the speaker is to provide an interpreter so that the congregation is able to understand what the speaker is saying.
Paul establishes the value to the Church, of both "tongues" and "prophesies", "With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord. Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.
The essence of this lesson is that we should not waste precious time on meaningless self-promotion that can be far better spent exhorting and edifying those who strive to teach the glorious good news of God's grace through the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, to the redemption of our eternal souls.~
No comments:
Post a Comment